If you read a newspaper last week you may have come across
the Twin story. If you didn’t hear about it, let me fill you in.
This was a paired cohort trial across Europe, consisting of
nearly 10k recruited-at-birth twin kids. Their parents agreed to raise one child
healthy and one unhealthy up to 18 years of age. So, at last, science would be
able to definitively answer questions about lifestyle.
The day-to-day habits of each twin were very different. For
example, one twin took-up all kind of fitness hobbies like tennis, football,
rugby, marathon running; the other took-up Playstation and crisps. One twin
would do boxing and the other box-sets.
But maintaining this trial wasn’t always easy. Small
children can be really stubborn when they want to be. We all know that kids are
selfish and even when involved in the noble pursuit of concrete scientific evidence
they can still only look-out for Number One. An example exchange over the
dinner table went something like
- (twin) Muuuum, but I don’t want any more fags
- (mum) Well if you don’t smoke all your fags you won’t have any pudding! Here’s a lighter, now start smoking!!
Some kids were on 50-a-day. That’s fags and Big Macs, not to
mention the booze. This was like Supersize Me for 0 to 18 year olds to
once-and-for-all prove the effects of bad lifestyle on health.
The results? We had thousands of real-live Danny Devitos and
Arnold Schwarzeneggers.
Of course, this isn’t a real trial. No children were forced
to chain smoke or maintain a heavy drinking habit, mainly because of annoying
things like “ethics” and “morals” getting in the way.
But there is a branch of scientific research that inhabits a
world where you can make babies smoke and down flaming shots. No, not in Middlesbrough
but the world of computer simulation.
Computer simulations allow us to experiment with “what-if”
scenarios. What if I stopped smoking at 30? What if I get off the bus one stop
early? What if I eat my 5-a-day? The simulated world is a bit like Sim City or
World of Warcraft but without the elfs. We can investigate the effect of
different interventions like giving over 60s statins or we can compare the
effects of disease prevention against treatment.
Teams of computer scientists, statisticians, public health
experts and clinicians develop superfast computer models, harnessing new
computing power to produce an answer quicker than ever so we can simulate more
and more people in more and more detail giving us better and better answers.
Probabilistic microsimulations can follow someone from day
one at birth to inevitable death and can tell individual stories for 10s of
millions of people, like the entire UK population.
In this time of austerity these models can help decisions
about where to best put the available moneys for maximum impact.
But, like an American info-mertial, this isn’t all. There’s
a way that these models can be used more directly to help you and me.
I went to the doctors recently and I swear he was looking up
what was wrong with me on Wikipedia. I wouldn’t have minded so much but he said
it was a toss-up between the plague and thrush.
But these PCs on GPs desks can also be put to use with the
simulation models too. “Informatics” has the aim to provide desktop tools that
can help the doctor and patient. Live evidence can be communicated to the
patient about the effects of any change (or not) in their lifestyle. Using interactive
widgets like sliders, dials and infographics the patient can be involved in the
process and take ownership of their health decisions, which will make it more
likely to be motivating and effective. They can see what likely outcomes are
from what causes of action.
With more data available than ever before, detailed models
and powerful, web-based and user-friendly interactive tools to use them then
hopefully in the future there’ll be fewer Danny Devitos and more Arnold Schwarzeneggers.
No comments:
Post a Comment